Your Purview license is already paid for. I make it run.

One senior data security architect, embedded in your Microsoft 365 E3/E5 tenant. Month to month. No SOW. Start Monday.

Start Monday 3 / 3 slots open · next start Monday

The same hands every week. No bench, no handoff.

I have spent my career on the engineering side of Microsoft’s data platform, running Purview, DLP, sensitivity labeling, and insider risk in production for regulated organizations.

Pattern is me doing that work inside your tenant: the same standards, on a subscription instead of a six-figure SOW. You work directly with the architect the entire time. There is no junior layer to manage and nobody to bring up to speed.

The gap between your license and your program is what I run.

Most
of E5 sits dormant

You bought the security and compliance stack. The labels, DLP, and insider-risk policy mostly are not turned on. I turn dormant Purview licensing into running policy inside 30 days.

9 mo
to fill a senior security role. Subscribe this week, start Monday.
Source: (ISC)² Workforce Study
$80–150k
per Big-4 security SOW. You get an ongoing operating model for the cost of a single project. Pause anytime.

A senior data security architect, operating inside your tenant.

PurviewDLPLabelsInsider RiskComplianceAI / CopiloteDiscoveryRetention

Day to day, the work is data protection in Purview: authoring and tuning DLP, rolling out sensitivity labels that people actually apply, standing up information barriers and retention, and handling eDiscovery and legal holds when counsel needs them.

Alongside that, insider risk and compliance: policies that catch real signal without drowning the team in noise, audit and investigation workflows you can hand to an examiner, and communication compliance reviews. Copilot and AI exposure get the same treatment, with guardrails written into the tenant instead of onto a slide.

How we work is plain. A written update every Friday, a quarterly posture report for leadership, and a direct line during business hours when something comes up.

“A recent engagement: I built and shipped a connector wiring Microsoft Purview into a live AI pipeline, so sensitive data was classified and governed before it ever reached the model.”
Healthtech client
Scope to production

One rate. A fraction of the alternatives.

Senior FTE (loaded)
~$22,000/mo

9-month hire, then onboard.

Big-4 SOW
$80–150k/ project

Project, not ongoing ops.

Pattern
Pattern
$7,500/mo

Start Monday, pause anytime.

One rate. Three slots. No SOW.

$7,500/mo

One architect. Three slots available.

Three slots opennext start Monday
  • One senior architect, in your tenant
  • Purview, DLP, labels, insider risk
  • AI / Copilot governance
  • One active workstream at a time, sequenced by priority
  • Weekly written update
  • Quarterly board posture report
  • Month-to-month, pause anytime
  • Start next business day
  • Tenant-scoped least-privilege access
  • DPA + BAA on request
Start Monday Pause anytimeReply within one business day

Three steps. No procurement cycle.

  1. 01
    Start
    Short intake form: tenant, scope, priorities. No SOW, no procurement.
  2. 02
    Kickoff call
    30 minutes. Least-privilege tenant access and priorities.
  3. 03
    Monday start
    First written update by Friday.

The questions a buyer actually asks.

Three slots opennext start Monday

Three slots. One architect. Start Monday.